EARLY TRANSISTOR HISTORY AT RCA

Jacques Pankove

 

Oral History – Jacques Pankove (Continued)

 

Since each new circuit was patentable, RCA speeded up the disclosure process by having someone pick up Lloyd’s notebook every other day and sort out the most valuable gems to be transformed into patents.  Sometimes Lloyd was unhappy with the performance of a transistor and would try anything to improve it.  One day, his inspiration led him to spread a drop of saliva over a point contact transistor.  He turned up the current causing the spittle to bubble.  When the bubbling stopped, the surface was black.  He used a toothpick to clean off the black scum and checked the performance of the transistor.  The current gain had increased significantly!  Lloyd Barton had discovered electrolytic etching.

 

Returning to the alloy junction transistor consisting of two indium dots on opposite sides of a thin germanium wafer, I hypothesized that if one were to collect most of the injected holes, the collector electrode should be much larger than the emitter.  To verify this hypothesis, I made a set of transistors having different sizes on indium dots on opposite sides.  When the current gain was plotted versus the ratio of collector to emitter area, it became evident that the larger this ratio was, the higher the current gain.  This concept was patented (US Patent #3,005,132) and produced an endearing nickname for me within the patent department: “Big-dot-small-dot Pankove”.  I also tried successfully the electrolytic etching of the surface using various electrolytes. 

 

 

 

 

 

Oral History – Jacques Pankove (Continued)

 

I also found that oxidation treatments were useful, such as evaporating SiO2 on the surface of germanium around the indium electrodes (See Patent J. Pankove and G. Ellis, 2,796,562).  Today, the surfaces of a transistor are always oxidized even in silicon transistors. 

 

The next interesting development was stimulated by our rivalry with GE.  They had also started to make transistors with indium dots, but called their devices diffused junction transistors while we called ours alloy junction transistors.  The question then was which name is correct?  I answered this question by the following experiment.  I immersed a small cylinder of germanium into a pot of indium at 600 degrees C overnight.  The next day, I let the indium cool off to room temperature and dissolved the indium.  Surprise!  A beautiful crystalline structure appeared at the end of the germanium cylinder that had been immersed in hot indium.  Evidently, germanium had dissolved into the indium and, on cooling, had recrystallized on the germanium seed, forming p-type germanium due to trapping of indium acceptor atoms in the growing crystal. (J.I. Pankove, et al, Proc. IRE 40, 1352 (1952), C.W. Mueller and J.I. Pankove, RCA Rev. 14, 536 (1954) and Proc. IRE 42, 336 (1954). 

 

 

   

Go To Pankove Oral History, Page 4

 

 

 

COPYRIGHT © 2001 by Jack Ward.  All Rights Reserved.  http://www.transistormuseum.com/

PAGE 3